By Edu Abade
Environmental activists have raised concern about reports on the Nigerian government’s ill-conceived, vexatious and painful attempt to import “non-hazardous” waste from the European Union (EU) into the country, saying it was a huge shock at a time of widespread ecological challenges.
Reacting to the development, the Health of Mother Earth Foundation (HOMEF) maintained that even wastes certified as non-hazardous are often hazardous, as they have been widely known to contain traces of heavy metals and other dangerous elements.
“We denounce the ploy, under any guise, to import any form of waste to Nigeria. It is clear that rich countries commodify waste and make it appealing to the appetites of poorer countries that are seeking foreign exchange by all means.
“As such, the EU could report that €18.5 billion worth of waste was exported from the continent in 2023. What the impacts of those wastes have been and will continue to be in the countries where they were exported is a question that the trade merchants will never answer.
“The EU seem to align with the assertion of Lawrence Summers, World Bank Chief Economist in 1991, who wrote that Africa is hugely under polluted and that it makes economic sense to dump wastes here. In his memo, he said: “Just between you and me, shouldn’t the World Bank encourage more migration of the dirty industries to the Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
“A given amount of health-impairing pollution should be done in the country with the lowest cost and the country with the lowest wages. I think the economic logic behind dumping a load of toxic waste in the lowest wage country is impeccable and we should face up to that.
“In a world that is in the grip of extreme geopolitical distortions, the shameful truth is that the high consumption nations are happy to offload their wastes on zones regarded as suitable for nothing except to be sacrificed as refuse dumps.”
In a statement made available to journalists by HOMEF Media and Communication Lead, ‘Kome Odhomor, the group cited the dumping of toxic waste in Koko, Delta State, Nigeria in 1988, adding: “These wastes were labeled “non-hazardous” and branded as “fertilizers.”
“While the labeling was to portray no harm, the actual content was indeed harmful, with significant impacts and contamination on air, water and land. We also remember the Trafigura case of waste dumping in Côte d’Ivoire (after several unsuccessful efforts to dump wastes in several other countries) for an induced fee of about $17,000 with the help of local collaborators in the name of waste management companies.
“The hazardous nature of the wastes was concealed and became known only after other countries refused. We see the request for Inclusion in the List of Countries to Which the Export from the European Union of Non-Hazardous Wastes and Mixtures of Non-Hazardous Wastes Destined for Recovery is Authorised” as a ploy to woo countries like Nigeria into obnoxious systemic legal waste colonialism.”
The statement issued by Kome, who doubles as Oilwatch Africa Communications Officer, further quoted Executive Director of HOMEF, Nnimmo Bassey as saying: “Nigeria and other African countries have become dumpsites for thousands of obsolete and unusable computers and other e-waste. Major sources of the e-waste include China, the United States, Spain, the United Kingdom, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Morocco.
“Nigeria is already plagued with environmental pollution arising from oil and gas exploitation, pollution arising from the exploitation of solid minerals, plastic pollution, and genetic pollution in foods. For a country already almost overwhelmed by these issues, seeking approval to import waste of any kind is not only ill-advised but also ecocidal and dangerous.
“This move exposes the government’s willingness to discount the wellbeing of citizens for a mess of porridge. It is inconceivable that a nation with life expectancy of about 56 years and a broken healthcare delivery system would succumb to the level of begging to import someone else’s waste, when we can hardly handle our domestic wastes.”
HOMEF, as well as other well-meaning Nigerians, rejects the Nigerian government’s plot to allow other countries and regions to use Nigeria or any other African nation as dumpsites for waste products from their conspicuous consumption.
